[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more nonfree stuff
From: |
torisugari |
Subject: |
Re: more nonfree stuff |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:24:02 +0900 |
On 12/9/06, Alexander Sack <address@hidden> wrote:
Yes, it would be best if mozilla would fix this for us. However, imo
its better for us to have an intermediate (though dirty) solution NOW
You mean MoFo guys have no clue on such a situation? In the long run?
No way. I don't understand why Camino developers can discuss the very
branding problem and Gnuzilla can't.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360015
As you see, Camino devs didn't change Mozilla tree at all,
but the discussion was not in vein. Same here, even if you'd chose
the sed workaround in the end.
- more nonfree stuff, Alexander Sack, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Alexander Sack, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Mike Hommey, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Mike Hommey, 2006/12/08
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Alexander Sack, 2006/12/09
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Mike Hommey, 2006/12/09
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Alexander Sack, 2006/12/09
- Re: more nonfree stuff,
torisugari <=
- Re: more nonfree stuff, Karl Berry, 2006/12/08
Petitioning Mozilla, Toby Smithe, 2006/12/08
Re: more nonfree stuff, torisugari, 2006/12/09