[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About Firefox licenses
From: |
Reed Loden |
Subject: |
Re: About Firefox licenses |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:42:19 -0600 |
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:22:34 +0100
Javier Garcia <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 01:15 AM, Sean Artman wrote:
> > "GNUzilla keeps the triple licensing used by Firefox and Mozilla in
> > general, in order to facilitate the reuse of code." -
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/
> >
> > Even though the MPL is not compatible with the GPL, it's still a free
> > software license. -http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
> so.. if all the FF licenses are free, FF 3.0 is also totally free???
Yes, current versions of Firefox 3 are completely free, license-wise.
There's no EULA anymore. However, as a side note, you really shouldn't
be using Firefox 3 anymore. Mozilla is ending support of it this month.
Current stable version is Firefox 3.5, and Firefox 3.6 is shipping
later this month, too.
> Privative software is the other way to say proprietary soft.
Ah, never heard of that word used that way before. Thanks for the
explanation.
~reed
--
Reed Loden - <address@hidden> / <address@hidden>
GNU Project [gnu.org] / Free Software Foundation [fsf.org]
- About Firefox licenses, Javier Garcia, 2010/01/14
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Reed Loden, 2010/01/14
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Sean Artman, 2010/01/14
- Re: About Firefox licenses, al3xu5 / dotcommon, 2010/01/14
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Koh Choon Lin, 2010/01/15
- Re: About Firefox licenses, alexus / dotcommon, 2010/01/15
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Graziano, 2010/01/15
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Reed Loden, 2010/01/15
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Mike Hommey, 2010/01/16
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Reed Loden, 2010/01/16
- Re: About Firefox licenses, Mike Hommey, 2010/01/17