[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?
From: |
Antonio Trande |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:08:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 09:28 PM, Loic J. Duros wrote:
>
> We're working on the release of IceCat based off 27.0.1, actually.
>
>
> Mauricio Fernandez Vitri <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've done some research and found that there are security updates
>> which fix more than 14 critical bugs for Firefox ESR [1].
>>
>> Aren't those critical bugs important enough to update IceCat?
>> Would you please consider updating it to the latest ESR?
>>
>> Thanks for your work,
>>
>> Mauricio
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefoxESR.html
I
>>
glad to see that this mailing list is populated since I wrote some
mails without a reply.
When you think will Icecat 27 be ready?
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=q9fy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?,
Antonio Trande <=
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?, Narcis Garcia, 2014/03/03