|
From: | awakeyet |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 45.7.0 release |
Date: | Sat, 18 Mar 2017 18:56:36 +0100 (CET) |
No. But the difference between icecat and firefox on window$ is the difference
between good rubber boots and leaky rubber boots, while crossing the ocean.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 22:23:01 Daniel Quintiliani wrote:So you would recommend most of the planet use Microsoft Edge then?
--
-Dan Q
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:58:25 +0100 (CET), <address@hidden> wrote:
> I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more
> secure browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET
> surveillance, freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those
> of apple and microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of
> disrespect that apple and microsoft have for user privacy (remember, they
> are a part of the nsa spying cult known as PRISM) are so high that there
> is no doubt in my opinion that any possible benefit to using icecat is
> instantly reduced to nothing while using it on windows or mac.
>
> Using icecat on windows or mac is like bringing a bucket of fresh water
> with you everywhere you go because it has the salt removed and is more
> secure against salt, and then going to the middle of the ocean and
> expecting your freshwater to not get salty. I honestly believe that
> everyone who suggests more hard work for those involved with icecat to
> make it function on windows or mac are some kind of weirdos with hidden
> intentions.>
> 14. Mar 2017 02:13 by address@hidden:
> > "Daniel Quintiliani" <> address@hidden> > writes:
> >> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as
> >> libre browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :(
> >
> > Please, let's not propose adding more work for Rubén. Given that he's
> > already too overloaded to produce IceCat releases in a timely fashion,
> > and given the paramount importance of reducing the latency of IceCat
> > security updates, I fully support his decision to reduce the amount of
> > work associated with each release. Let someone else volunteer to build
> > binaries for Windows and Mac, if there's sufficient interest.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > --
> > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |