Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat 52.x flashplayer plugin location

[Narcis Garcia]

El 19/07/17 a les 18:38, Habs ha escrit:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:28:19 +0200
> David Hedlund <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> We are against flash so its not included at all.
>>
> 
> thanks for the one-liner - succinct!
> 
> I didnt ask if it was included - I asked where I *should* put it (apart
> from the bin if I am to follow your train of thought) and at the same
> time explained where I had put it currently, to get it work.
> 
> So once more with feeling, where would be the correct place
> to put it in the Icecat directory structure, or have I got it right
> already ?
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Habs
> 
> PS: it did work in the previous version I had, before this latest one,
> without having to do what I have this time.  I'm guessing the 'we are
> against flash' will have documented somewhere that this was a
> collective decision for this release.....and I missed it! 
> - 
> 
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
> 

I suggest you to look M.Firefox directories structure to see where does
it detect the flash plugin presence.

About the rejection of Adobe Flash... it's easy with Icecat project
definition: Only FOSS can guarantee the announced security features.