[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22 |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:21:33 -0800 |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> It was trivial: printf does not necessarily support \xHH hexadecimal
>> escapes.
>
> Thanks for catching that. I looked and found one other problem of that kind.
> I tried running the tests on Solaris and AIX and found a few more porting
> issues in the grep tests, and installed the attached.
Hah! TIL head -N and yes are not portable. Thank you.
I've been spoiled/corrupted by writing coreutils tests for so long.
I would prefer to continue to use "yes" via the following, at least
in the first test. That way is clearer. In the second, I could go either
way, since your awk process replaces both yes and head, at the
expense of being a bit less concise and less readable.
What do you think of this patch?
0001-tests-do-use-yes-but-via-an-AWK-replacement.patch
Description: Text Data
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/07
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Jim Meyering, 2016/01/08
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/08
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Jim Meyering, 2016/01/08
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Jim Meyering, 2016/01/08
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/08
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22,
Jim Meyering <=
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/09
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Jim Meyering, 2016/01/09
- bug#22181: endless loop in grep 2.22, Jim Meyering, 2016/01/09