[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
From: |
OKUJI Yoshinori |
Subject: |
Re: Time to fork the netboot code? |
Date: |
Wed, 09 May 2001 15:34:01 +0900 |
From: Chip Salzenberg <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:40:29 -0700
> > "extra" feature anyway. So transition to a more powerful set of
> > device drivers would be necessary.
>
> Hm. Has anyone started on this?
No, AFAIK. However, you cannot do this alone. It is necessary to
implement real memory management and handle protected-mode interrupts
and real-mode ones concurrently, using v86-mode. That is exactly the
plan which should be done after 1.0 release.
Okuji
- Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/07
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/08
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/08
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?,
OKUJI Yoshinori <=
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Christoph Plattner, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10