[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #24967] Multiboot specification flag mixup?
From: |
Trond |
Subject: |
[bug #24967] Multiboot specification flag mixup? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:33:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Opera/9.60 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en-GB) Presto/2.1.1 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24967>
Summary: Multiboot specification flag mixup?
Project: GNU GRUB
Submitted by: tsg1zzn
Submitted on: Sat 29 Nov 2008 04:33:39 PM GMT
Category: Documentation
Severity: Major
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Non-software Error
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 0.6.95
Reproducibility: Every Time
Planned Release:
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Quote:
If bit 3 of the `flags' is set, then the `mods' fields indicate to the kernel
what boot modules were loaded along with the kernel image, and where they can
be found. `mods_count' contains the number of modules loaded; `mods_addr'
contains the physical address of the first module structure. `mods_count' may
be zero, indicating no boot modules were loaded, even if bit 1 of `flags' is
set.
"even if bit 1" should say "even if bit 3", right?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24967>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #24967] Multiboot specification flag mixup?,
Trond <=