[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: segfault in CVS HEAD
From: |
Bill Schottstaedt |
Subject: |
Re: segfault in CVS HEAD |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:13:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 |
I also have hit that bug -- next time it happens, I'll
try to track it down. Have you (Dirk) had a chance to
look at the procedure-source bug mentioned a few weeks
ago (and related to this one, I bet)? It is a real
problem for me that procedure-source is not a usable
source anymore -- I can't use the CVS Guile.
Here's the original -- I don't know why the mailer
translates "pound at l a m b d a":
----
In Sunday's Guile (6-jun):
guile> (define (hi a) (+ a 1))
guile> (procedure-source hi)
(lambda (a) # @ lambda (+ a 1))
Is this (the new "# @ lambda") an intentional change?
If I call the procedure, the # @ lambda disappears:
guile> (define (hi a) (+ a 1))
guile> (hi 1)
2
guile> (procedure-source hi)
(lambda (a) (+ a 1))
----
Surely debugging junk like this can be put under a
debugging flag and not impact everyone else?
- Re: segfault in CVS HEAD,
Bill Schottstaedt <=