Re: [bug #22022] hashx-set! and -ref

[Gregory Marton]

Thanks, yes.  I initially had a one in there.  Hmmm... it doesn't matter. 
33 is enough to trigger resize.

Thanks,
Grem

> Follow-up Comment #2, bug #22022 (project guile):
>
> Another one:
>
>   (pass-if (equal? "#<hash-table 34/61>"
>                     (with-output-to-string (lambda () (write table)))))))
>
> Actual output here has 33 instead of 34.  I believe 33 is correct, because
> the additions to the hash table run from 2 up to 34, not from 1 up to 34.
>
> Agree?
>
>    _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?22022>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Message sent via/by Savannah
>  http://savannah.gnu.org/

--
------ __@   Gregory A. Marton                http://csail.mit.edu/~gremio/
--- _`\<,_                                                                .
-- (*)/ (*)               Teach you backwards to speak I can.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~_~~~_~~~~~v~~~~^^^^~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~++~~~~~~~