[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile 1.8.5 test failure: srfi-14.test
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: guile 1.8.5 test failure: srfi-14.test |
|
Date: |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:50:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
> > The cardinals of these char sets were taken from SRFI-14:
> >
> > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-14/srfi-14.html#StandardCharsetDefs
This text also contains the complete lists of 117 characters for 'letter'.
Comparing it with the 124 characters that I got, the differences are at
#\246 U+00A6 BROKEN BAR
#\250 U+00A8 DIAERESIS
#\264 U+00B4 ACUTE ACCENT
#\270 U+00B8 CEDILLA
#\274 U+00BC VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER
#\275 U+00BD VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF
#\276 U+00BE VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS
The Unicode classification of these characters has not changed between
Unicode 3.0 and Unicode 5.0.
But these are exactly the byte values which differ between ISO-8859-1 and
ISO-8859-15.
$ LC_ALL=de_DE.iso88591 locale -c LC_CTYPE | head -6
LC_CTYPE
upper;lower;alpha;digit;xdigit;space;print;graph;blank;cntrl;punct;alnum;combining;combining_level3
toupper;tolower;totitle
16
1
ISO-8859-15
Oops. My system has a locale called 'de_DE.iso88591' which is in fact using
ISO-8859-15. Not a bug in guile. Sorry for the noise.
Bruno