Re: call/cc oddness

[Neil Jerram]

"Bill Schottstaedt" <address@hidden> writes:

> Is this a bug?

I'd say not.  It looks like a useful generalization.

> scheme@(guile-user)> (call/cc (lambda (a . b) (a 1)))
> 1
> scheme@(guile-user)> (call/cc (lambda arg ((car arg) 1)))
> 1
> scheme@(guile-user)> (call/cc (lambda (a b) (a 1)))
> ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #<program 8bf5330 at standard input:3:9 
> (a b)>
>
> r5rs.html and r6rs.html say "Proc must be a procedure of one argument" -- 
> perhaps
> ambiguous?

Whereas what we implement is "Proc must be a procedure that can accept a
single argument".

    Neil