[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1
|
From: |
Hans Aberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2011 15:34:38 +0200 |
On 22 May 2011, at 16:02, Andy Wingo wrote:
> But, it is 1 and 2, currently. (+ FOO) inlines just to FOO, too
> optimistically.
It is unspecified according to rsr5.
Hans
- (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/22
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/23
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/23
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Mark H Weaver, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/25
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Mark H Weaver, 2011/05/25