[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10974: address@hidden
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#10974: address@hidden |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:09:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline
>>> functions?
>>
>> In some way, though their address could still not be taken.
>
> Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a
> concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness). Does that not work?
Yes, right, so we could just inline them all.
Ludo’.