[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9973: Inconsistent documentation of repeated arguments
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
bug#9973: Inconsistent documentation of repeated arguments |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:20:45 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun 06 Nov 2011 20:10, address@hidden writes:
> Why not tighten up notation in the docs as well as in the language?
> (4) -- Scheme Procedure: error who message irritant1 ...
>
> IMO, (4) is the right thing.
I just checked and I think we are OK (only simple-format has ". args",
and that only to be consistent with the following C prototype) -- thanks
to your patches, also. Please submit a new patch if you find more
instances of foo . bar in prototypes.
Cheers :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#9973: Inconsistent documentation of repeated arguments,
Andy Wingo <=