[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15140: number->string doesn't accept the optional precision argument
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
bug#15140: number->string doesn't accept the optional precision argument |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:34:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Hi :)
Ignorant question: what is the precision argument good for? FWIW
Guile's inexact reals are all 64-bit doubles.
Just curious :)
Andy
On Tue 20 Aug 2013 14:05, Göran Weinholt <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello schemers,
>
> the number->string procedure from (rnrs) should accept the optional
> precision argument, but does not:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (number->string 1.1 10 53)
> ;;; <stdin>:2:0: warning: possibly wrong number of arguments to
> `number->string'
> ERROR: In procedure number->string:
> ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure number->string (_ #:optional
> _)>
>
> The example should return "1.1|53".
>
> Tested with GNU Guile 2.0.9.71-8d5d04.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#15140: number->string doesn't accept the optional precision argument,
Andy Wingo <=