[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26164: time-difference mishandles leap seconds
From: |
Zefram |
Subject: |
bug#26164: time-difference mishandles leap seconds |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2017 22:41:26 +0000 |
Computing the duration of the period between two UTC times, using
SRFI-19 mechanisms:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-19))
scheme@(guile-user)> (define t0 (date->time-utc (make-date 0 59 59 23 30 6 2012
0)))
scheme@(guile-user)> (define t1 (date->time-utc (make-date 0 1 0 0 1 7 2012 0)))
scheme@(guile-user)> (time-difference t1 t0)
$1 = #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: 0 second: 2>
The two times are 2012-06-30T23:59:59 and 2012-07-01T00:00:01, so at
first glance one would expect the duration to be 2 s as shown above,
the two seconds being 23:59:59 and 00:00:00. But in fact there was
a leap second 2012-06-30T23:59:60, so the duration of this period is
actually 3 s. The SRFI-19 library is aware of this leap second, and
will compute the duration correctly if it's translated into TAI:
scheme@(guile-user)> (time-difference (time-utc->time-tai t1)
(time-utc->time-tai t0))
$2 = #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: 0 second: 3>
The original computation in UTC space should yield a result of 3 s,
not the 2 s that it did. Since 1972, the seconds of UTC are of exactly
the same duration as the seconds of TAI. (They're also phase-locked to
TAI seconds.) Thus the period of three TAI seconds is also a period of
three UTC seconds. It is not somehow squeezed into two UTC seconds.
-zefram
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#26164: time-difference mishandles leap seconds,
Zefram <=