bug-guile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#33044: Guile misbehaves in the "ja_JP.sjis" locale


From: Tom de Vries
Subject: bug#33044: Guile misbehaves in the "ja_JP.sjis" locale
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:26:12 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 10/18/18 3:56 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Tom de Vries <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 10/16/18 3:57 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>> Thanks for the report, analysis and patch.  I agree with your analysis,
>>> and the patch looks good.
>>>
>>
>> If so, can the patch be committed?
> 
> I just pushed commit c2a654b7d29f5e2f32fd1313cc80162fd0c8f992 to the
> stable-2.2 branch,

Thanks!

> which includes the fix from your patch (although I
> used 'scm_from_utf8_string' instead of 'scm_from_latin1_string'),

Right, that should give the same result on that string.

> and
> many other instances of the same problem.  These fixes will be in the
> upcoming guile-2.2.5 release.
> 
> Does that address the problem for you?
> 
There are two pecularities I'm affected by:
- I'm not able to build from git (and I haven't found instructions
  listing in the README what the correct auto* invocation is). So,
  tarballs only.
- gdb does not support guile 2.2 (so I'd need a backport of this fix to
  stable-2.0 branch). See also "PR21104 - 7.12.1 does not compile with
  latest guile (2.1.6)"
  ( https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21104 ).

As for testing, I've done the following:
- applied the patch onto the 2.2 tarball, build and ran tests, and ran
  hello.scm reproducer
- ported the patch to the 2.0 tarball, build and ran tests, and ran
  hello.scm reproducer
- build gdb master against the the 2.0 tarball build, ran gdb guile
  tests, and ran the gdb reproducer.

This is as far as I can take it, and all LGTM.

Thanks,
- Tom

> I'll leave this bug open at least until 'seed->random-state your-seed'
> is fixed to support wide strings.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
>      Mark
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]