[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lsof
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: lsof |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:55:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Sonntag, 3. März 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> > the lsof tarball contains the source in a two-stage process: After
> > unpacking, one is left with lsof_4.87_src.tar, which needs to be
> > unpacked as well.
> Weird.
I have seen it before, the tarball contains the source tarball and some
additional metadata.
> > But apparently, NAME and VERSION are not passed through as function
> > arguments (they are #f). Would it make sense to changes this?
> It wouldn’t hurt to pass them, and it may be helpful in cases like this.
> So feel free to add it to build-system/gnu.scm and gnu-build-system.scm.
This looks complicated after all: One would probably need to repeat NAME
and VERSION in the arguments section of a package; source seems to be
passed automatically. And then there is the semantic difference between the
name of a derivation and the name of a package...
> > Or do you see a preferable way of doing the second stage unpacking?
> You could use (find-files "." "\\.tar$") to find the tar file, I guess.
Thanks, I will rather go for this!
Andreas
- lsof, Andreas Enge, 2013/03/03
- Re: lsof, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/03/03
- Re: lsof,
Andreas Enge <=