bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43232: jack2 fails to build on aarch64


From: Mike Rosset
Subject: bug#43232: jack2 fails to build on aarch64
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:46:29 -0700
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> The error message is:
> [228/274] Compiling example-clients/simdtests.cpp
> ...
> [243/274] Linking build/example-clients/jack_simdtests
> ...
> ld: example-clients/simdtests.cpp.28.o: undefined reference to symbol 
> '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3'
> ld: 
> /gnu/store/9xmlrmk7vnlzwq5049500r9lrcf6ikqq-gcc-7.5.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6: 
> error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> ...
> Waf: Leaving directory `/tmp/guix-build-jack2-1.9.13.drv-0/jack2-1.9.13/build'
> Build failed
>  -> task in 'jack_simdtests' failed with exit status 1 (run with -v to 
> display more information)
> command "python" "waf" "build" failed with status 1
>
> Following the advice and running "python waf build -v", the executed gcc
> command is printed:
> Build failed
>  -> task in 'jack_simdtests' failed with exit status 1:
>       {task 281472893294736: cprogram simdtests.cpp.28.o -> jack_simdtests}
> ['/gnu/store/ap7hgyv4rjqmhg4a6cb6cypsh3g1f5q4-gcc-7.5.0/bin/gcc', 
> '-Wl,-rpath=/gnu/store/bwmp037cg6gfz31j9q441j800mvk7wva-jack2-1.9.13/lib', 
> 'example-clients/simdtests.cpp.28.o', 
> '-o/tmp/guix-build-jack2-1.9.13.drv-0/jack2-1.9.13/build/example-clients/jack_simdtests',
>  '-Wl,-Bstatic', '-Wl,-Bdynamic', '-Lcommon', 
> '-L/gnu/store/zwrg5jwyj1222vyjdpmppijzhz04sqid-opus-1.3.1/lib', 
> '-L/gnu/store/mpm43myhw7difa8p3a9xnag3zb6pnn4b-dbus-1.12.16/lib', '-ljack', 
> '-lpthread', '-lopus', '-ldb', '-lrt', '-ldl', '-ldbus-1', '-lm']
>
> Andreas

undefined reference to symbol '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3 looks
like a potentially gcc flag order issues.  Seems -lstdc++ should be at the
end of the g++ command invocation. I'll see if I'll have time today to look 
into this more.


Mike





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]