[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Dec 2020 13:46:28 +0100 |
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> writes:
> SBCL and ECL are patched to use our cl-asdf because it is necessary to
> build the sbcl-* and ecl-* packages. Also patching ABCL, CCL, and Clisp
> sounds like a good idea. At least all the compilers would use the same
> version of ASDF, and hopefully behave in the same way when looking for
> configuration files.
Yup, that'd be neat :)
Related to this, I've noticed another issue with SBCL packages: when an
SBCL package has a dependency that's updated in ~/common-lisp,
(asdf:load-system ...) tries to recompile it in its folder, which fails
since /gnu/store is read-only.
Example:
- Apply the above patch or edit
~/.config/common-lisp/source-registry.conf
to make sure ~/common-lisp is loaded before system packages.
- Install sbcl-cl-cookie.
- Check out https://github.com/fukamachi/quri:
git clone https://github.com/fukamachi/quri ~/common-lisp/quri
- Now run
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ sbcl
* (asdf:load-system :cl-cookie)
WARNING: System definition file
#P"/gnu/store/81cwmspx3366vdjs6v20rnd8a0xyr6in-sbcl-cl-fad-0.7.6/share/common-lisp/sbcl/cl-fad/cl-fad.asd"
contains definition for system "cl-fad-test". Please only define "cl-fad" and
secondary systems with a name starting with "cl-fad/" (e.g. "cl-fad/test") in
that file.
debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread
#<THREAD "main thread" RUNNING {100B790203}>:
Error opening
#P"/gnu/store/22q4ydm0pagi4irz0clssgkhkyh115j8-sbcl-cl-cookie-0.9.10-1.cea55ae/lib/common-lisp/sbcl/cl-cookie/src/cl-cookie-tmpGHU3ALSV.fasl":
Read-only file system
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Not sure what to do about this.
I'm guessing that Common Lisp development is not practical with Guix'
SBCL packages and I should just stick to the CL packages.
Thoughts?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/03
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/03
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/03
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/03
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/04
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/04
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/04
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/04
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/12/05
- bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/12/05