[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56467: vala command compiles files instead of running them
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
bug#56467: vala command compiles files instead of running them |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:35:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 9 Jul 15 19:18 vala -> vala-0.54
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 10 Jul 15 19:18 vala-0.54 -> valac-0.54
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 10 Jul 15 19:18 valac -> valac-0.54
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nixbld nixbld 147248 Jul 15 19:18 valac-0.54
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 12 Jul 15 19:18 valadoc -> valadoc-0.54
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nixbld nixbld 451032 Jul 15 19:18 valadoc-0.54
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 24 Jul 15 19:18 vala-gen-introspect ->
> vala-gen-introspect-0.54
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nixbld nixbld 1067 Jul 15 19:18 vala-gen-introspect-0.54
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 nixbld nixbld 12 Jul 15 19:18 vapigen -> vapigen-0.54
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 nixbld nixbld 720128 Jul 15 19:18 vapigen-0.54
>
> If you read attentively, you'll see there's no proper 'vala' binary,
> vala, vala-0.54 and valac are all symbolic links to valac-0.54, which is
> the compiler.
>
> Perhaps upstream changed the behavior? Or it could be that they use
> arg0 (the program name) to infer different behaviors, which gets mangled
> by our wrappers.
I just confirmed the later in #vala on the gnome IRC server. Let's see
what we can do.
Maxim