[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#63986: Julia is very slow
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
bug#63986: Julia is very slow |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2023 17:37:31 +0300 |
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 03:26:30PM +0200, Cayetano Santos wrote:
>
>
> >mer. 21 juin 2023 at 22:39, Cayetano Santos <csantosb@inventati.org> wrote:
>
> >>mer. 21 juin 2023 at 16:36, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>
> >>wrote:
> >
> >> Hey!
> >>
> >> The benchmark you posted, Cayetano, is:
> >>
> >> julia -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.add("BenchmarkTools"); using BenchmarkTools; N
> >> = 1000; A = rand(N, N); B = rand(N, N); @btime $A*$B'
I've been having a hard time with that command, so I've been running
julia -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.add("BenchmarkTools"); using BenchmarkTools; N = 1000;
A = rand(N, N); B = rand(N, N); @time A*B'
I'm not sure if that's useful or not but I didn't see a different with
LIBBLAS* set.
> >>
> >> This is a matrix multiplication that gets delegated to the underlying
> >> BLAS right. Running it under ‘perf record’ confirms it:
> >>
> >> Samples: 139K of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 99624880590
> >> Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> >> 35.27% .julia-real libblas.so.3.9.0 [.] dgemm_
> >> 3.99% .julia-real libjulia-internal.so.1.8 [.] gc_mark_loop
> >> 2.60% .julia-real libjulia-internal.so.1.8 [.] apply_cl
> >> 1.06% .julia-real libjulia-internal.so.1.8 [.] jl_get_binding_
> >>
> >> We’re using libblas.so (presumably from the ‘lapack’ package) and not
> >> OpenBLAS, so no wonder it’s slow.
> >>
> >> Could it be that:
> >>
> >> "LIBBLAS=-lopenblas"
> >> "LIBBLASNAME=libopenblas"
> >>
> >> is ineffective? I think we have a lead!
> >
> > Are we following all instructions here ?
> >
> >
> > https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1.8/devdocs/build/distributing/#Notes-on-BLAS-and-LAPACK
> >
> > I’m thinking about the variables LIBLAPACK and LIBLAPACKNAME.
>
> To complete my previous comment, I just realised that
>
> Base.USE_BLAS64
>
> gives "true" when running fast. Guix julia gives "false".
>
> C.
I'll see what comes with switching it to blas64
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Cayetano Santos, 2023/06/09
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/06/14
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/19
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/06/21
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Cayetano Santos, 2023/06/21
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Cayetano Santos, 2023/06/22
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow,
Efraim Flashner <=
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/22
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Efraim Flashner, 2023/06/22
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Cayetano Santos, 2023/06/22
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/22
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/06/23
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Efraim Flashner, 2023/06/23
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/23
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/23
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Efraim Flashner, 2023/06/23
- bug#63986: Julia is very slow, Simon Tournier, 2023/06/22