bug#40125: Problem with guix offload: Remote channel closed

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Mikael,
>
> Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com> skribis:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:46 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com> skribis:
>>>
>>> We’re missing a tiny bit.  :-)  Could you run strace with ‘-s 3000’ or
>>> similar so that it doesn’t truncate it?
>>>
>>> (The “strange characters” are Unicode HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS.)
>>>
>>
>> Ah... :)
>>
>> Here's a larger chunk of backtrace:
>>
>> 19530 read(20, "Backtrace:\n          13 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure
>> 563a9e2f92a0>)\nIn ice-9/boot-9.scm:\n    718:2 12 (call-with-prompt
>> (\"prompt\") #<procedure 563a9e3167e0 \342\200\246> \342\200\246)\nIn
>> ice-9/eval.scm:\n    619:8 11 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user)
>> 563a9e39a750>)))\nIn ice-9/command-line.scm:\n   181:18 10 (_ #<input:
>> string 563a9e3a8bd0>)\nIn unknown file:\n           9 (eval (begin
>> (use-modules (guix) (srfi srfi-34) # #) \342\200\246) #)\nIn
>> ice-9/eval.scm:\n   721:20  8 (primitive-eval (begin (use-modules (guix)
>> (srfi \342\200\246) \342\200\246) \342\200\246))\nIn ice-9/psyntax.scm:\n
>>  1241:36  7 (expand-top-sequence ((begin (use-modules (guix) \342\200\246)
>> \342\200\246)) \342\200\246)\n  1194:19  6 (parse _ ((\"placeholder\"
>> placeholder)) ((top) #(# # \342\200\246)) \342\200\246)\n  1233:19  5
>> (parse _ ((\"placeholder\" placeholder)) ((top) #(# # \342\200\246))
>> \342\200\246)\n   285:10  4 (parse _ ((\"placeholder\" placeholder)) (()) _
>> c&e (eval) \342\200\246)\nIn ice-9/boot-9.scm:\n  3389:20  3
>> (process-use-modules _)\n   222:17  2 (map1 (((guix)) ((srfi srfi-34))
>> ((rnrs io ports)) (#)))\n  3390:31  1 (_ ((guix)))\n   2809:6  0
>> (resolve-interface (guix) #:select _ #:hide _ #:prefix _
>> \342\200\246)\n\nice-9/boot-9.scm:2809:6: In procedure
>> resolve-interface:\nno code for module (guix)\n", 16384) = 1150
>
> Thanks!  Commit 8f53d73493a2949e2db28cd7d689a690b2d9479a improves error
> reporting in this case.
>
> This can be tested by running “guix copy --to=HOST coreutils” for a host
> where Guix modules are missing.

Great, closing!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim