[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:17:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/18/11 08:50, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
>> If memory serves, we were going to add a configure-time flag
>> to change the program names from z* to gz*, which sounds
>> reasonable, when someone gets around to it.
>
> Exactly.
Is that a change you could write? That would help move things along,
I expect.
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, (continued)
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Matias A. Fonzo, 2011/01/20