[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cross compilation problems
From: |
Mark Kettenis |
Subject: |
Re: cross compilation problems |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:39:32 +0200 (MET DST) |
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:07:55 -0700
From: Steve Bowman <sbowman@frostwork.net>
No bug report needed. /usr/i386-gnu/lib is indeed a symlink to /gnu/lib
and ldd under hurd shows:
libc.so.0.2 => /lib/libc.so.0.2 (0x01022000)
for all libraries. ldd under linux just finds the wrong libc so that's
the wrong way to check.
Indeed. ldd is useless in cross-compiling situations, since it is
invoking the Linux ld.so on a Hurd binary.
Mark
- Re: cross compilation problems, (continued)
- Re: cross compilation problems, Roland McGrath, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Steve Bowman, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Daniel E . Baumann, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Steve Bowman, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Steve Bowman, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Gordon Matzigkeit, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Steve Bowman, 2000/10/27
- Re: cross compilation problems,
Mark Kettenis <=
- Re: cross compilation problems, Steve Bowman, 2000/10/25
- Re: cross compilation problems, Pankaj Kaushal, 2000/10/26
Re: cross compilation problems, Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/10/25