[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface
|
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2001 15:50:04 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
> > Basically, half of shmid_ds and retreived with
> > `shmctl (id, IPC_STAT, &shmid_ds)', e.g. number of current attaches,
> > shm_atime, shm_dtime and shm_ctime.
>
> Blech. Why not just keep track of that information in a file
> somewhere?
If I interpret what Roland says correctly, he is quite against this.
pgpvwa2OmYJT2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/01
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/05
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/08
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/08
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/10
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/10
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/11
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/05/11
- Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface,
Neal H Walfield <=
Re: [PATCH] System V Shared memory interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/05/08