[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc broken
|
From: |
Mark Kettenis |
|
Subject: |
Re: glibc broken |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2001 17:17:08 +0200 |
I can't reproduce Marcus' problems with a freshly checked out glibc.
Everything appears to work fine for me.
Oh, and invoking ld.so on a statically linked executable isn't
supposed to work I think. Produces a segmentation fault on Linux and
Solaris, so I think the current Hurd hebaviour is quite acceptable.
- glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/22
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken, Roland McGrath, 2001/05/23
- Re: glibc broken,
Mark Kettenis <=
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Mark Kettenis, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/25
Re: glibc broken, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/05/23