[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: might not be glibc after all
|
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: might not be glibc after all |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:34:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> it might not be a glibc problem after all. I have gone back as far as
> 2001-02-26, and that was broken already. I am now trying to compile the
> version corresponding to the current working Debian package 2001-02-16.
> If that is broken as well, we have a tool chain problem.
We are lucky, 2001-02-16 seems to work with my build chain. So the critical
change seems to be somewhere inbetween. I will try intermediate versions.
I just hope I get not confused with so many versions of glibc floating
around.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de