[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Message passing in user-land
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Message passing in user-land |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:13:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:21:55PM +0200, rreale@iol.it wrote:
> Why we can't implement message passing entirely in user-space rather
> than in the kernel?
Imagine you remove all IPC from the kernel. How do you send a user-space
message to another process? You can't.
That said, there is a lot of things in GNU Mach that can be in user space.
Mach is a microkernel of the first generation. Try to take a look at L4,
which is a modern microkernel that is extremely minimal.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/15
- Re: Message passing in user-land,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Niels Möller, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, Niels Möller, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, rreale, 2002/07/16
- Re: Message passing in user-land, James Morrison, 2002/07/16