[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uname -s
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: uname -s |
Date: |
23 Oct 2002 13:43:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Petri Koistinen <petri@joo.ath.cx> writes:
> I think uname -s should print: GNUmach.
uname -s prints the kernel, but it's the "kernel" in Unixspeak, that
is, the thing that interprets the "system calls" where the "system
calls" are read/write/open.
In other words, the canonical case is a monolithic Unix kernel. uname
-s should describe whatever entity it is that provides the facilities
provided by a monolithic Unix kernel.
That's the Hurd, in our case.
Now, we might *also* want to mention Mach in the uname -s output, but
certainly not only.
- uname -s, Petri Koistinen, 2002/10/21
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/23
- Re: uname -s,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/29