[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts
|
From: |
Joachim Nilsson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:36:28 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:04:44PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> > It's hard to believe you get no package loss in GNU Mach 1. Do you flood
> > the GNU/Hurd box from a GNU/Linux box? I have seen horrible package loss in
> > that situation, which was much better with GNUMach v2.
> I see the same situation here. When I flood gnumach1 I see package
> loss around 99%! With gnumach2 around 5%. It's sill not good but
> much better.
This is really interesting. What NIC's do you use?
/Joachim
--
Joachim Nilsson :: <joachim AT vmlinux DOT org>
+46-(0)21-123348 :: <http://joachim.vmlinux.org>
- [PATCH] soft interrupts, Daniel Wagner, 2003/01/28
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/28
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Daniel Wagner, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts,
Joachim Nilsson <=
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Daniel Wagner, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/01/29
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Joachim Nilsson, 2003/01/30
- Re: [PATCH] soft interrupts, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2003/01/29