[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:41:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 06:47:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > If someone beats me to it, then great.
>
> no chance, still on exams (and lucky that i found a minute to check mail)
finished with exams! :)
looking at the package, i think it'd be nice to re-do debian/rules to use
more modern packaging with debhelper and dbs-style building. do you mind
if i rewrite debian/rules?
I don't have much experience with dbs-style packaging though. Jeff, what
do you suggest? cdbs?
--
Robert Millan
- [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/10
- [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, Robert Millan, 2003/06/10
- Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Robert Millan, 2003/06/10
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/06/21
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Jeff Bailey, 2003/06/21
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Robert Millan, 2003/06/22
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules),
Robert Millan <=
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Michael Banck, 2003/06/27
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Jeff Bailey, 2003/06/27
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Michael Banck, 2003/06/23
[Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/11