[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FTBFS: python
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: FTBFS: python |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:46:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:56:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Indeed.
>
> It's Debian who decided (implicitly, by not special-casing the Hurd) that
> the Debian python package (for which I asked for help to compile) should be
> compiled with threads support.
>
> Perhaps we should ask ourselves whether or not it might be worth to
> ask the maintainer to disable threads completely for hurd-i386 until
> we know how to fix this, since a python package without threads support
> is obviously more useful than not having a python package at all.
If using the libpthread implementation in the Hurd is a problem, we could
easily enable libpthread emulation in libpth untill NPTL is ported to Mach,
like I did for the GNU/KNetBSD port (see my last mail in bug #218011)
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
- Re: FTBFS: python, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/11/17
- Re: FTBFS: python, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/11/17
- Re: FTBFS: python, Robert Millan, 2003/11/19
- Re: FTBFS: python, Santiago Vila, 2003/11/21
- Re: FTBFS: python,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: FTBFS: python, Santiago Vila, 2003/11/21
- Re: FTBFS: python, Duck, 2003/11/22
- Re: FTBFS: python, Santiago Vila, 2003/11/22
- Re: FTBFS: python, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/11/26
- Re: FTBFS: python, M. Gerards, 2003/11/26