[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uptime (coreutils)
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: uptime (coreutils) |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:49:02 -0500 (EST) |
who and w have always been different things. who is fine as it is and has
nothing to do with w. We have the Hurd's w and uptime because they are
better than other versions.
As to functions like fetch_boot_time, if they are useful to applications
that aren't Hurd-specific, then they are useful to specify somewhere or
other in an OS-independent fashion. That could be just gnulib, or perhaps
glibc's libutil for this particular kind of thing. But it's only
worthwhile if it's a single interface that many things will actually use.
- Re: uptime (coreutils), (continued)
- Re: uptime (coreutils), James Morrison, 2004/03/13
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Roland McGrath, 2004/03/14
- Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14
Re: uptime (coreutils),
Roland McGrath <=
Re: uptime (coreutils), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2004/03/14