[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:52:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (UnebigoryĆmae) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
Thomas,
> My proposal is better because it does these tasks in user space.
Your other comments basically made sense, however, in the context of
this statement, I have become extrememly confused. So, before I react
to your other comments, I would like you to elaborate what you mean by
this statement. Specifically, what about my proposal does not happen
in user space? What I suggest (and what Ogi has basically
implemented) are changes to libpager (in the form of adding
pager_notify_eviction) and modifying ext2fs to only map active
metadata. Nothing about this involves changes to the kernel; nothing
I propose involves using undocumented features; everything I suggest
functions within the Mach 3 framework.
Thanks,
Neal
- Ognyan's libpager changes, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/02
- Re: Ognyan's libpager changes, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/02
- Review of Roland's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/13
- Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/16
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/16
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/16
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Ognyan Kulev, 2004/08/17
- Re: Review of Thomas's >2GB ext2fs proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/08/17