Re: The Hurd Reference Manual - overhaul

[Leonardo Pereira]

> > 
> > It can be better than one Wiki, but I think that we need a on-line version 
> > that the people can read the newest modifications. Because If only a group, 
> > or one person, works in this job the manual could turn boring and 
> > discourage people to send fixes. I think that we need most people possible
> >
>  
> thats what CVS usually is for.  When its software, its all the
> experimental updates being worked on, some good, some currently
> broken, so the same applies to software for the human mind as well.
> Using a wiki when you already have CVS to do that is redundant, and
> pointless when as said before, a wiki is less secure to people
> meddling and putting false information in.  You can track who made
> what changes with CVS with very fine detail.
> 

but nor all have CVS and to send something to a cvs server you need a acount, 
and this will turn the simple fact to send a fix so complex that the people go 
to give up to fix, if had not liked the ideia of Wiki, that such one list of 
e-mails? or any another way where anyone can help, and that be simple.
______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

-- 
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.


Powered by Outblaze