[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:36:19 +0200 |
So why not off_t in the structure instead?
Well, either we use off_t or we use loff_t (or even off64_t). Is
there any rule as to what should be used? Because I don't have a real
opinion about it (other then maybe that loff_t is clearer then off_t)
- diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Roland McGrath, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Roland McGrath, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/09/28
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/09/29
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/30
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Roland McGrath, 2004/09/30
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/30
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Roland McGrath, 2004/09/30
- Re: diskfs.h `filepointer' type, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/09/28