[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pthread headers
From: |
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho |
Subject: |
Re: pthread headers |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:48:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On 20050111T174249+0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I would expect GCC to eventually fix its inline handling to conform with
> C99
>
> The problem isn't C99, but C90, __inline is handled differently than
> inline by gcc. The former works even with -ansi enabled.
I was under the impression that __inline is an alias for inline, with no
semantic differences. If I'm correct, then extern __inline will change
semantics when extern inline does.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/
Blogi - http://kaijanaho.info/antti-juhani/blog/
Toys - http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/10
- Re: pthread headers, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Roland McGrath, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers,
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <=
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, James A. Morrison, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11