[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ams-before-putsch
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: ams-before-putsch |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:33:24 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > Marcus, I'm not even sure how to talk to you. Just remove that
> > idiotic tag at once (unless I did it right). You have no
> > business calling what I am doing illegal, by force or sudden.
>
> What did Marcus tag?
>
> The GNU Mach tree.
>
> Marcus, can you find a name for the tag which is less provocative?
>
> Why is there a need for a tag at all? It isn't like the patches are
> earth shaking, make huge changes or are untested.
I can't make sense of what you're saying.
You said to me that you hadn't committed anything; so what revisions
have been tagged?
Anyone can create a tag which will help them keep track of the source
code, for whatever purpose they wish. There, I've made an Executive
Decision.
That said, I do think that Marcus should choose a name which you do
not find hurtful.
Thomas
Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/09
Re: ams-before-putsch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/10
- Re: ams-before-putsch, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/10