[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: commit access policies
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: commit access policies |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:00:06 +0100 |
Well, it sounds like Sergio Lopez would like one; is that correct?
I have no qualms with that, other than it might be hard to get the
stuff propagated back to gnumach-1-branch/HEAD depending on how
detailed Sergio is with ChangeLog's, etc etc etc. So I'd rather see
more use of the existing branch instead of a new branch. But if
Sergio wants to have his own branch to commit cruft, and then once in
a while sends his stuff back so it can be added to gnumach-1-branch,
then I suppose that would be fine.
- Re: commit access policies, (continued)
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: commit access policies, Sergio Lopez, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/11/13
- Re: commit access policies, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/11/14