[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: Fixed Roland'd Hurd EA ext2 patch for Linux
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: OT: Fixed Roland'd Hurd EA ext2 patch for Linux |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:28:23 +0100 |
I am subscribed to the list. No need to send the messages to me in
private unless you are in a hurry, since gnu servers seem to be
late these days. :-)
It is normal to CC all people whom you reply to on a mailing list.
However, the modifications are not made properly by GPL2 (including
the dates of modification and proper notices that the files are
being distributed under it). I was told this is Linux style. If it
is needed to follow this style so the patch is included, I will
agree to it. Should we submit it to lkml?
I don't know what the procedure to include a patch in Linux is. If
there are some problems including the patch (copyright, functionality,
...) then this is up to the maintainers of Linux to point out. I
think there is no harm in submitting it to where ever patches go for
Linux.
Another solution I am thinking in working on is modifying debugfs
to allow people to set translators in an umounted filesystem. This
would require no linux building, but only a e2fsprogs update.
What is debugfs?