[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Mach's build system (partly) reworked
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Mach's build system (partly) reworked |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:28:45 +0100 |
> ./configure --prefix='$(libexecdir)/foo' --libexecdir=/foo
Do you really consider that as a valid use case? Putting
libexecdir's files into `/foo/' and everything else into
`/foo/foo/{bin,share,...}/'?
Yes, I have ended up using similar hacks on several occassions.
If this really bothers you I can add that functionality, of course.
Thanks.
> I only left in those installation-related variables that are
> actually used: prefix, exec_prefix, bootdir and includedir. I
> don't see the need for any others, but perhaps I'm overlooking
> something?
>
> infodir/datadir/datarootdir?
Those are not used within GNU Mach.
That is where the manual gets installed. Looking at the Makefile.in,
it is hardcoded to the incorrect value of $(prefix)/info, but that is
for another day.
> Would be better to simply stop using manually maintained .in's,
> and use automake, then one won't have to care about such changes.
> Jeff Bailey had such a patch.
I was under the impression that his patches were for the Hurd only.
I think he did something for GNU Mach too.
Thanks.
Re: GNU Mach's build system (partly) reworked, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/01/31