[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we want a server on `/servers/machine' (or similar)?
|
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Do we want a server on `/servers/machine' (or similar)? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 May 2007 15:13:12 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello!
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:20:26PM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Sat, 12 May 2007 21:01:02 +0200,
> Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Yes, but that would require keeping some state in the server, which I
> > wanted to avoid, because...
>
> As you have PORT and presumably an associated peropen, I am not
> convinced by your argument.
Sorry, I can't follow you here. In my opinion, the server running on
`/servers/io_perm' should be a simple proxy with some sort of internal
access control. It should not needd to keep any state for every request.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Do we want a server on `/servers/machine' (or similar)?, (continued)
Re: Do we want a server on `/servers/machine' (or similar)?, Roland McGrath, 2007/05/13