[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [META] Replying to messages, again
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: [META] Replying to messages, again |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:34:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:58:09PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> The person you've been meaning to send this message to isn't a
> subscriber of the bug-hurd mailing list (IIRC), so he didn't receive
> your reply.
Thanks for pointing it out. I now bounced the reply to him.
Have you informed him that he didn't receive any of the replies?...
> Hurd and also most of the other GNU mailing lists do accept posts from
> addresses which are not subscribers of the respective mailing lists,
> so please, everyone, simply get used to use the `g' key in Mutt (as an
> example) or your mailer's ``reply to all'' functionality when replying
> to posts.
Sorry, but no. The list-reply feature of Mutt is there to be used, and
I'm going to use it.
I guess we can't expecty everyone sending a message to a list he is not
subscribed to, to know about the mail-followup-to: header, and set it
accordingly, so a good mail client will DTRT automatically. But we
certainly can expect people to mention somewhere in the mail that they
are not subscribed, so others know they need to Cc: them.
-antrik-
- Re: Code Bounty, (continued)
- Re: Code Bounty, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/09/10
- Re: Code Bounty, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/09/12
- Re: Code Bounty, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/09/14
- Re: Code Bounty, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/09/15
- Re: Code Bounty, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/09/15
- Re: Code Bounty, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/09/16
Re: Code Bounty, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/09/14
Re: Code Bounty, Gregory Plummer, 2008/09/21