[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc.
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc. |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:37:26 -0800 (PST) |
accept4.c should define __accept4, move the accept.c guts there, accept
should just call __accept4 with 0 flags.
CLOEXEC is purely in libc, just pass O_CLOEXEC to _hurd_intern_fd.
O_NONBLOCK can be set normally (io_set_openmodes) on the socket
before installing it in the fd. That is the intent: that at no
time does the fd exist but without O_NONBLOCK set.
The whole body should indeed be inside HURD_CRITICAL_BEGIN anyway.
But that's just for signal safety. It doesn't have anything to do
with a window without O_NONBLOCK, since that window would be for
the port that is not yet installed into an fd.
Thanks,
Roland
- About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc., Thomas Schwinge, 2008/12/08
- Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc., Thomas Schwinge, 2008/12/09
- Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc.,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc., Thomas Schwinge, 2008/12/10
- Re: About SOCK_CLOEXEC, SOCK_NONBLOCK flags, accept4, etc., Thomas Schwinge, 2008/12/10