[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer
From: |
Da Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:16:40 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Hi,
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net
>> wrote:
>
>>> These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
>>> virtualization project.
>> I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
>> whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or would
>> it be better to have a separate repository for that?
>
> I don't see why it should go into the incubator at all. Just put it on a
> branch in the main repository -- like it was in CVS.
I think tschwinge wants all new components go to incubator. The main repository
is only for modified components which has already existed in Hurd.
Zheng Da
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, (continued)
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Da Zheng, 2009/12/24
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/24
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/26
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer,
Da Zheng <=
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/28
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/30
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23