[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Implicit IN?
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Implicit IN? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:13:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Tue 27 Sep 2011 03:03:31 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 23 Sep 2011 03:26:21 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I fail to see why integers or
> > > character arrays would by any more implicitly IN than other
> > > types?...
> >
> > Because they can't be OUT.
>
> Doesn't answer my question. Why can't they? In fact we have many such
> parameters in the Hurd and Mach .defs...
I was starting from the C function prototype actually, not the defs
prototype. In the former case a mere integer can't be OUT.
Samuel
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, (continued)
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/13
- Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN? (was: Interface for SCSI transactions ?), Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/23
- Re: Implicit IN?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/29
- Re: Implicit IN?,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/13
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/09/23
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/14
- Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Thomas Schmitt, 2011/09/15
Re: Interface for SCSI transactions ?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/09/05