[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My second report.
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: My second report. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:04:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hi!
Taking the technical issue to the bug-hurd mailing list.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:08:37 +0300, Fotis Koutoulakis
<fotis.koutoulakis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I managed to get GCC-Go built and passing its
> tests under a Linux Vm featuring XUbuntu (32bit). However it's tests didn't
> report the same as the ones Mr. Thomas had post on his mail with the title
> "Re: Hurd port for the GCC go".
OK, then please follow up to that email of mine, and show how your
results are different. Are they very different?
> I also tried to build gcc go under the Hurd
> but every one of the 5 times I tried it, it ended up crashing while
> building it and never finishing. I will investigate it further tomorrow
How is it crashing? Reproducibly at the same place? Does it just hang,
or do you get a Mach kernel panic, or something else?
Also, how is that virtual machine configured itself, and how much swap
space does it have available (»vmstat«)?
> P.S2 I understand that both of you have your day jobs and receive large
> volumes of emails way more important than my spammy reports. If you would
> like me to stop sending these messages, or perhaps reduce the volume or
> switch to another communication channel, then don't hesitate to tell me
> about it.
No, that is all fine, thanks! :-)
Grüße,
Thomas
pgpIrnWGVwNYA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: My second report.,
Thomas Schwinge <=