[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2)
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:25:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:35:51 +0200, a écrit :
> OK, I'll move the check to recvmsg.c then. No problem:) We can also do a
> full re-authentication at the receive end, should that be added too?
I don't remember what that means, but you might need that.
In any case, you should really check that lying about the *uid does get
detected.
Samuel
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), (continued)
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2),
Samuel Thibault <=